|
Adolf Hitler fancied himself an
artist in the classical style but was rejected twice by the Vienna
Art Academy and then made his way to Munich in 1913, where he earned
a meager living painting watercolors for tourists. He volunteered
for the German army in the First World War and was appalled by what
he saw when he returned to Munich after Germany’s defeat and the
abdication of the Kaiser in November 1918. Mein Kampf
denounces “cultural Bolshevism” as a Jewish plot to divide and
confuse the German people, applying this term to abstract and
expressionist art, atonal music, jazz, anti-war art and literature,
“obscene” art and literature, Freudian psychoanalysis, and Albert
Einstein’s bizarre theory of relativity. The new Weimar Republic
had indeed become a hotbed of cultural experimentation, as
avant-garde outsiders suddenly gained influence as professors in art
academies, museum directors, theatrical directors, film makers,
architects, and writers. Women had gained the vote, and the
Republic welcomed foreign immigrants while exposing a mass audience
to avant-garde cultural experiments through the new media of film,
lithograph posters, and radio. Hitler was by no means alone when he
denounced these trends; the Republic witnessed the emergence of many
forms of xenophobia and anti-modernism before the Nazi Party became
a major political force in 1930. In this class we will analyze the
relationship between art and politics, to ask why Germany became
such fertile ground for cultural experimentation in the 1920s, why
that experimentation caused so much anxiety, and whether the
backlash against “cultural Bolshevism” explains the rise of the
Nazis to power. We will seek in other words to make judicious use
of film, literature, and works of art to enhance our understanding
of social and political history in these turbulent years.
We will take as our starting point
Peter Gay’s classic work, Weimar Culture: The Outsider as Insider,
first published in 1968. Gay interprets the complex debates among
Weimar intellectuals in terms of a basic conflict between rational
modernists, who embraced the urban industrial world and sought to
make their audience feel at home in it, and “neurotic”
anti-modernists, who experienced so much anxiety in the face of
modernity that they regressed to childish emotional states and
sought authoritative guidance from powerful father figures. You
will all be asked to write a five-page book review of Gay by the end
of the first week of class to summarize his argument clearly and
take a stand regarding its persuasiveness. In the rest of the term
your assignment will be to update, refine, and/or refute Gay’s
arguments. From today’s perspective this book clearly suffers from
major omissions; it says almost nothing about the contributions of
women to Weimar culture and the emotional debate over gender roles
in the 1920s, neglects the role of the many Communist intellectuals
who do not fit neatly into either of Gay’s basic categories, and
relies for its analysis of film on the first book published on the
topic in 1947, neglecting recent advances in film studies. Gay
relies heavily on Freud’s concepts of the “Oedipus complex” and
“regression”, which are more controversial today than they were in
1968, and he is also vague about the causes of the failure of
parliamentary democracy during the Great Depression. Today even
Gay’s admirers must ask whether there were perhaps “neurotic”
modernists in the 1920s, whether Freudian psychoanalysis offers any
helpful guidance to understanding women’s history, and whether some
conservatives presented a rational critique of the flawed
institutions and economic policies of the Republic. Our common
readings and film screenings are designed to enable you to fill in
the gaps in Gay’s argument by the time you take our final exam, and
you will then be invited to reevaluate his basic thesis. You will
also be asked to conduct individual research on one Weimar
intellectual of particular interest to you, and write a term paper
of 12-15 pages to analyze the usefulness of Gay’s hypothesis for
explaining his or her career. You should consult at least three
sources in addition to our required readings for your term paper, if
possible including a significant primary source, i.e., an
autobiography, diary, or other substantial work written by your
subject.
To earn credit for this course you mast attend
class faithfully, participate actively in class discussions, and
complete the following assignments:
- Write a
five-page book review of Peter Gay’s Weimar Culture, to
be submitted via e-mail by midnight on Friday, April 26.
Evaluate in particular the strong and weak points in the
controversial arguments of chapters 4-6 (worth 15% of your final
grade).
- Write an
essay of 4-5 pages to compare the stage and film versions of
Brecht’s Threepenny Opera, due on May 7 (20% of your
final grade).
- Write a term
paper of 12-15 pages on the life and times of one Weimar
intellectual of special interest to you, and present a 15-minute
oral report on your research findings to the class at the end of
the term (25% of final grade for the paper, plus 10% for the
oral report). You should submit a first draft of your term
paper by 9:00 p.m. on May 15, so that I can give you feed-back
by the time you deliver your oral report on May 17; final drafts
are due by noon on Monday, May 20.
- Take a
three-hour final examination on Saturday, May 18, to expand,
update, and reevaluate Peter Gay’s argument about Weimar Culture
in light of our class readings and film screenings (30% of your
final grade).
Please remember that
in the spring term format, to miss one day of class is worse than to
miss a whole week of a normal history course. Each day of class
will involve a two-hour period for lecture and discussion in the
morning plus a “lab session” of two to 2 ½ hours in the afternoon to
view and discuss films. PLEASE TURN OFF ALL ELECTRONIC DEVICES
IN CLASS! Take notes with pen and paper, look each other in the
face when we converse, and focus all your attention on the topic
under discussion. All formal lectures will be based on image
galleries that will be posted on the course website for you to
review at your convenience. A list of our required readings and a
schedule of class meetings follow:
v
Peter Gay, Weimar Culture: The Outsider as Insider
(Norton, 2001).
v
Anton Kaes et al., eds., The Weimar Republic Sourcebook
(University of California Press, 1995).
v
Berthold Brecht, The Three-Penny Opera (Penguin, 2007,
first published in 1928).
v
Anton Kaes, Shell Shock Cinema: Weimar Culture and the
Wounds of War (Princeton University Press, 2009).
|
|
DATE |
LECTURE |
DISCUSSION |
LAB |
|
Apr 22 |
Phases in the history of
the Weimar Republic and Peter Gay’s approach to cultural
history. |
Preliminary conversation
about “modernism” and “anti-modernism.” |
View The Cabinet of Dr.
Caligari (dir. Robert Wiene, 1919, 74 minutes). |
|
Apr 24 |
Dada and Expressionism in
the early postwar years. |
DISCUSS Peter Gay,
Weimar Culture , chapters 1-4, and Weimar
Republic Sourcebook, nos. 184-93. |
View and discuss
Nosferatu (dir. Franz Murnau, 1922, 94 min.) |
|
Apr 26 |
The “New Objectivity” in
the mid-1920s. |
Discuss Peter Gay, chapters
5-6, and Weimar Republic Sourcebook, nos. 194-97,
262-63. |
View Metropolis
(dir. Fritz Lang, 1927, 148 min.). Five-page book
review of Peter Gay due by midnight. |
|
Apr 29 |
Were the right-wing critics
of the Weimar Republic all “neurotic” anti-modernists? |
Discuss Weimar
Sourcebook, nos. 8, 47-51, 114, 117, 128-31, 133-38,
143, 145-46. |
DEADLINE to choose
a term paper topic: Schedule
conferences with me for Monday afternoon. |
|
May 1 |
The stereotype of the “New
Woman” and the problems faced by actual women in the
1920s. |
Discuss
Julia Sneeringer, “The Shopper as Voter: Women,
Advertising, and Politics in Post-Inflation Germany,”
German Studies Review, 27 (2004): 476-501 (available
on J-STOR), and
Weimar Sourcebook,
nos. 72-84, 205, 280-91, 304-14. |
View Pandora’s Box
(dir. G.W. Pabst, 1929, 133 min.) |
|
May 3 |
“Form follows function!”
Fordism, the Bauhaus, Berlin, and their critics. |
Discuss Weimar
Sourcebook, nos. 150-60, 165-83. |
View Berlin: Symphony of
a Great City (dir. Walther Ruttmann, 1927, 62 min.). |
|
May 6 |
Bertolt Brecht’s “theater
of estrangement” and the onset of the Great Depression. |
Bertolt Brecht, The
Threepenny Opera (Penguin edition, pp. xiii-xlii,
3-82, & 91-112). |
View The 3 Penny Opera
(dir. G.W. Pabst, 1931, 110 min.).
5-page essay due
by 5:00 p.m. on May 7: Compare
and contrast the film and stage versions of this work.
Which makes a more effective political statement, and
which makes a superior artistic statement?
|
|
May 8 |
Debates over the social
significance of crime and vice. |
Discuss Weimar
Sourcebook, nos. 266, 269, 306-311, 316-327. |
View M (dir. Fritz
Lang, 1931, 110 min.). |
|
May 10 |
The dissolution of the
Weimar Republic and lingering trauma of the Great War. |
Anton Kaes, Shell Shock
Cinema, pp. 1-130. |
View Westfront 1918
(dir. G.W. Pabst, 1930, 90 min.) |
|
May 13 |
The Nazi seizure of power. |
Anton Kaes, Shell Shock
Cinema, pp. 131-216. |
ViewTriumph of the Will
(dir. Leni Riefenstahl, 1935, 110 min.). |
|
May 15 |
The cultural policy of the
Third Reich. |
Xeroxed excerpts from
Mein Kampf and Joseph Goebbels. |
View The Adventures of
Baron Münchhausen (Agfacolor, dir. Josef von Báky,
1943, 120 min.). |
|
May 17 |
Lessons from Weimar in the
founding of the Federal Republic of Germany.
|
Exchange of term paper
findings. |
Exchange of term paper
findings. |
|
FINAL EXAM
on Saturday, May 18.
TERM PAPERS DUE by noon
on Monday, May 20. |
|
|