HISTORY OF SUGAR – DOMESTICATION TO THE 17th
CENTURY
The sweetening carbohydrate that modern man calls sugar – sucrose – has a long history as a valuable worldwide commodity. Sugarcane is believed to have been first domesticated in New Guinea around 8000 B.C. and would spread throughout the Pacific islands until 2000 years later, when cultivation would begin in Indonesia and India. By 800 B.C. China would be introduced to the crop, a time when India began to consider the plant to have great commercial value. Three hundred years later, the Persians, Arabs and Greeks would encounter the plant that sweetened drinks and foods without the use of honey, but not until 500 A.D. do we find “unmistakable written evidence” of the production of molasses and crystallized sugar from the Hindu doctrine Buddhagosa (Mintz, 23). The western expansion of the Arabs during the 7th and 8th centuries marked the beginning of introduction of sugar to Europe and to the West; the invasions of Egypt and Spain not only brought sugar cane cultivation to Morocco and the Canary Islands but made sugar an available yet scarce and very valuable commodity in Western Europe. The Crusades only exacerbated the overwhelming demand and Europeans were hungry for land in climates that could sustain the sugarcane plant. First prized as a medicine and then a luxurious spice by Europeans during the Middle Ages, refined sugar would soon be valued as a sign of ultimate wealth and power. Sugar production of the New World would begin with the transplanting of sugar cane from the Canary Islands into Hispaniola by Christopher Columbus at the end of the 15th century. By 1509, sugar began to be produced widely in the West Indies for profit and the British, French, Portuguese and the Dutch began to cultivate sugar cane in other West Indian nations, Brazil, Mexico and Central America. According to Burke, by the 17th century, “sugar production in the subtropical and tropical Americas had become the world's largest and most lucrative industry” (Burke, e).
This website, created in order
to complement a lecture made by Georgia Southern Professor Ray Burke at the
1997 Academic Alliances conference, details the histories of honey, sugarcane
and beets in the diet of humans from the beginning of their use until the
present. Very informative and interesting source although
brief.
THE BEE, THE REED,
THE ROOT - The History of Sugar
Amazingly thorough and detailed
history of sugar derived from the sugarcane. Mostly focused
on cultivation in the
Sweetness
and power : the place of sugar in modern history
SACCHARAM
– GRASS
AND RUM
Sugarcane is a group of six species of grass native to southern
Sugar cane propagation is through stem cuttings of
immature canes 8-12 months old. These are called "setts",
"seed", "seed- cane" or "seed-pieces". The setts are best if taken from the upper third of the cane
because the buds are younger and less likely to dry out. The setts can be planted at a 45 degree angle or laid
horizontally in a furrow. It takes 12,500 - 20,000 setts
to plant one hectare (Purseglove 1979). The setts are lightly covered with soil until they sprout
(10-14 days) and then the sides of the furrow are turned inward (McIlroy 1963). Sugar cane is a perennial crop which usually
produces crops for about 3-6 years before being replanted. The first crop is called
the "plant crop" and takes 9-24 months to mature, depending on
location (Purseglove 1979). Reaping is usually done
by hand with a cutlass, although mechanical harvesters are being developed. The
cane is cut close to the ground because the lower stem has the highest sugar
content and it aids in ratooning, the emergence of
new crops from the stems and trash (leaves and tops) left behind (McIlroy 1963). Ratoon crops take
about one year to mature. As many as four or more ratoon
crops may be produced before replanting is necessary, mostly due to the slow
decline in yields (McIlroy 1963, Purseglove
1979).
Once cut, the sugar is extracted through a long process of grinding,
soaking, heating and cooling which creates two products: refined sugar
(sucrose) and molasses, a thick syrup. The
crystallized white sugar that we use in our kitchens and at our dinner tables
requires a synchronized effort by plantation workers in order for a quality
product to be made – according to Mintz, “what we
call ‘sugar’ is the end product of an ancient, complex and difficult process” (Mintz, 21).
In order to make rum, molasses is fermented, distilled and aged in oak
casks.

FIGURE I: THE SUGARCANE STALK
FROM http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/SC034

FIGURE II: SUGAR PRODUCTION
FROM http://www.dpi.qld.gov.au/sugar/12087.html
For many
ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS:
Cultivated sugarcane, with
millions of acres planted worldwide, quickly depletes soil naturally. With new
fertilizers and other chemical products being used, there is a dangerous
potential for the sugar-dependent island nations to run out of fertile land.
What are the solutions? FROM the University of Florida’s Rotational Crops for Sugarcane
Grown on Mineral Soils:
Many authors agree that soil organic matter is the key to soil
fertility and productivity. In the tropics and subtropics, soil organic matter
decays very rapidly. There are several forms of maintaining and/or increasing
organic matter in soils:
1.
Addition of inorganic nutrients in amounts that are adequate for crop
production, taking into consideration what will be removed by the crop from the
field;
2.
Addition of organic materials as organic amendments: animal manures, composts,
municipal and industrial biosolids, municipal solid
waste, food-processing wastes.
3.
Addition of organic matter as green manure and/or cover crops.
The
establishment of cover crops (grasses or legumes) prior to planting sugarcane
offers many potential agricultural and ecological benefits to the grower.
Potential benefits from using cover crops include production of organic matter
to enrich the soil, ground cover to reduce wind erosion (soil), weed control
(less herbicide being used), reduced runoff, improved infiltration, soil
moisture retention, improved soil tilth, nutrient
enhancement, and food for wildlife. By improving soil organic matter, cover
crops directly influence the soil water holding capacity by increasing water
retention and lateral water movement within the soil.
Rotation
of susceptible agronomic crops with crops that are not hosts for nematodes or
are resistant to certain nematodes has been a successful nematode management
strategy in many instances (Watson, 1922; Reddy et al., 1986). The continuous
use of a monoculture may encourage certain diseases, weeds, or insects; the
continuity of the pest cycle may be interrupted by an alternative crop.
Well-fertilized thick stands of a grass, such as corn, will produce more above
ground residues than will a legume and tillage will favor a more rapid
decomposition of organic matter produced (Tisdale and Nelson, 1975).
Cover
crops may increase soil organic carbon levels or reduce their rate of
depletion. The selection of appropriate cover crops to increase soil organic
carbon requires good knowledge of the quality and quantity of plant biomass
produced and its rate of decomposition in soil (Kuo
et al., 1997). Fallowing the field without plant residue returning to soils
typically increases the rate of organic C depletion (Hargrove, 1986; Havlin, 1990).
Planting
cover crops after sugarcane harvest increases cropping intensity and residue
return and reduces the length of time the soil is left fallow. Cover crops may
also reduce soil erosion (Smith et al., 1987) and NO3-N leaching
during high rainfall periods (McCraken et al., 1994).
Cover crops in
OTHER LINKS
From Southern Illinois University site
Ethnobotanical
Leaflets – Sugar cane
Ethnobotanical Leaflets – Sugarcane: Past and Present
From
Sugarcane Botany: A Brief View
Rotational Crops for Sugarcane Grown on
Mineral Soils
The History of U.S. Sugar Protection
Safety
and Health Fact Sheet: Hazardous Child Labour in Agriculture
– Sugarcane from International Programme on the Elimination of Child Labour
J. H. Galloway
Annals of the Association of American
Geographers, Vol. 86, No.
4. (Dec., 1996), pp. 682-706.